What We're Building


For people who struggle to stay engaged, focused, or cognitively steady—especially autistic adults—most tools miss how their minds actually work.


InVigor is building a different approach: a structured AI companion designed to support thinking, reduce cognitive overload, and help people stay meaningfully engaged in complex tasks.


This is not about replacing human thought—it’s about strengthening it.


InVigor™ Companion Technology 


Amplifying Human Capability with Augmented Intelligence (AI)



The AI Prism Phase, a structured, strengths-based framework for human–AI collaboration designed to enhance sustained cognitive engagement—particularly for autistic adults. It positions artificial intelligence not as a tool for automation or behavioral correction, but as a cognitive partner that supports thinking through iterative, structured dialogue.


The Problem

Autistic adults often experience cognitive overload, disengagement, and difficulty sustaining attention—despite strengths in deep focus, pattern recognition, and interest-driven cognition. Current AI approaches emphasize assessment or adaptation to neurotypical norms, frequently misaligning with these strengths and limiting long-term effectiveness.


The Insight

Drawing on monotropism theory, InVigor anchors interaction in areas of intrinsic interest. When engagement aligns with these interest channels, cognitive load decreases while clarity, focus, and performance increase.


The Model: From Mirror to Prism

Traditional AI mirrors user input, often reinforcing existing patterns. In contrast, the Prism model introduces structured refractive thinking:

  • Expands perspective rather than confirming it
  • Decomposes and reorganizes ideas
  • Builds a shared cognitive workspace over time

Human cognition provides direction and intuition; AI contributes structure, pattern expansion, and articulation.


Protocol-Driven Interaction

Engagement follows a defined four-phase structure to ensure coherence and safety:

  1. Arrival — define the problem space
  2. Exploration — expand and reframe perspectives
  3. Integration — organize and synthesize insights
  4. Closure — consolidate outcomes

This prevents drift, maintains agency, and supports sustained, productive engagement.


Hypothesis

Interest-anchored, iterative human–AI collaboration can:

  • Increase sustained attention
  • Improve cognitive clarity and organization
  • Expand cognitive flexibility
  • Strengthen decision readiness and agency

These outcomes are designed to be empirically testable.


Why It Matters

The model addresses a critical gap: the lack of structured cognitive environments aligned with autistic thinking. If validated, it enables:

  • Greater participation in knowledge-based work
  • Reduced cognitive overload
  • Enhanced problem-solving capacity
  • A scalable, non-judgmental support system


Broader Application

While designed for autistic adults, this framework extends to any population experiencing cognitive load, isolation, or attentional challenges. It represents a shift toward AI as a system for augmenting human cognition, not just generating outputs.


Core Principle

The value of AI lies not only in what it produces, but in how it structures and extends human thought.


Current Projects in Development

Augmented Intelligence Applications

Button

 About InVigor™

InVigor™ is a protocol-first human–AI companion platform in development, built on Augmented Intelligence (AI)—technology that expands human judgment rather than automating it away.

It is designed to support cognitive engagement and nervous-system coherence, strengthening everyday clarity, judgment, and aligned action. By fusing body–mind steadiness with refractively-structured AI dialogue, it deepens alignment, enhances focus, and cultivates resonant, integrative thinking.

Read More

The AI Prism Phase

  • 1. What is the AI Prism Phase?

    The AI Prism Phase refers to a mode of human–AI interaction in which dialogue transitions from standard prompt–response exchange into iterative, collaborative exploration. Within this mode, ideas are developed jointly across successive exchanges, allowing conceptual expansion, pattern recognition, and multi-directional reasoning to emerge over time.


    This interaction is intentionally anchored within the individual’s strongest intellectual domain. By operating within structured areas of intrinsic interest, the framework supports sustained engagement and enables a form of interaction participants often describe as “thinking together,” rather than instruction or response.

  • 2. Where does it differ from "mirror" AI?

    Conventional AI interaction functions primarily as a reflective system (“AI Mirror”), generating outputs based on user prompts. In certain contexts, this reflective pattern can unintentionally mirror and reinforce negative or distorted thinking patterns.


    The AI Prism Phase introduces an exploratory dynamic in which ideas are refracted rather than mirrored. The interaction supports divergence, recombination, and structured expansion of thought, enabling a more generative form of human–AI collaboration that moves beyond response into co-development of ideas.

  • 3. Why does this matter?

    A substantial body of autism research indicates that deeply held interests can serve as stabilizing and regulatory anchors. Within these domains, individuals often demonstrate increased attention, reduced agitation, and improved cognitive organization.


    The AI Prism Phase leverages this by initiating interaction within those domains and sustaining exploration over extended periods. This creates a structured engagement environment aligned with the individual’s cognitive profile, with the potential to support sustained focus, stability, and meaningful intellectual activity. These possibilities are the focus of a proposed feasibility study currently seeking funding and collaborators.

  • 4. How is it designed for safety?

    The framework is grounded in a structured safety protocol appropriate for populations that may experience dysregulation, paranoia, or cognitive rigidity. The AI system is constrained from making diagnostic or therapeutic claims, asserting authority, or encouraging dependency.


    Interactions follow a defined sequence—grounding, exploration, optional deepening, integration, and closure—ensuring the process remains observable and clinically manageable. In higher-risk scenarios, interactions may be guided or overseen by clinicians. Safety is maintained through constraint, structure, and domain anchoring rather than open-ended interaction.

Briefs & Articles

The Prism Model — A Refractive Approach to Human–AI Collaboration

By L.Z. LeRoy • April 1, 2026
It's time to stop listening and start living!

A Focused Research Direction: Interest-Anchored Collaboration in Autism

By L.Z. LeRoy • April 2, 2020
There's more power in your self than you imagined. Be ready to explore.

The Loneliness Epidemic & the Rise of AI Cognitive Companions

By L.Z. LeRoy • March 12, 2019
It may be time to rethink everything you've ever learned about how to succeed in your professional life.

Let’s Talk

We are open to research collaborators, clinical partners, and funding entities aligned with autism research, neurodivergence, and human-centered AI development. If this framework aligns with your work, we welcome further discussion.


We are actively seeking aligned partners to help bring this work into applied environments and measurable outcomes.



Contact Us